UK Tourist & Leisure Attractions

GPS Sat Nav Review Update of the Garmin etrex Legend

Update Oct 06 - one year on.  Living with our GPS Sat Nav receiver.
See this article's main sat nav review
Other product reviews | Digital Camera | Panasonic camcorder | 2 way radios

Since we wrote our GPS review article a year has passed.  In that time we've used our GPS Sat Nav receiver on many trips and outings - weekend breaks in the Rye area in 2005 and Arundel area in 2006, our 2006 Somerset holiday, in London, and on many walks.

To start on a positive note, we've largely solved the short battery life problem with the purchase of some higher capacity NiMh cells.  We easily get a day's usage now using 2100 mAh capacity batteries, although we still can't understand why the Sat Nav receiver consumes so much power.

The GPS receiver has proved to be a robust little unit, as we've dropped it a least twice onto hard tarmac and all it suffered were some minor abrasions.  However, that brings us to the first bad point.  The reason we dropped it in the first place on one occasion was because the battery cover attachment clip came undone.  As this clip also doubles as the eyelet for the lanyard attachment, the unit dropped to the ground - with battery cover still attached to our wrist via the lanyard!  The clip turns through 90 degrees to attach and it easily comes undone, a more robust clip or, better still, an attachment for the lanyard on the main unit would be a better design.

We've been unable to solve the poor integration with the Basemap, despite tinkering with the magnetic variation setting and Map Datum.  We've also looked for a software upgrade that may solve this problem, but there hasn't been one from Garmin since we brought the Sat Nav receiver over a year ago.  Come on Garmin!

The problem with poor GPS satellite reception in the city or wooded areas remains too.  On a visit to London we couldn't get a GPS signal in the West End at all, until we moved into Hyde Park, then it was fine.  The same problem with no signal was apparent at Cheddar Gorge when climbing Jacobs Ladder.  And on another occasion we thought the unit had failed as it couldn't latch onto any signal at all for several hours, this under heavy cloud cover, but hey, clouds are not that unusual!

On a number of occasions the GPS Sat Nav receiver reported silly data on the Trip Computer page - recording 106 miles and an average speed of 56 mph on a short walk (and we thought it was the hill that puffed us!).  Another time was even more ridiculous when it said we'd done 619 miles, hit 622 mph and a moving average of 317 mph!  Now Mike's car's fast, but not that fast!  Crazy!

Left. Wow, just see here how fit we are!  The Trip Computer says we've walked 264 miles in 1hr 21mins at an average of 194mph while all along our top speed was 9.1mph (that in itself is an impossibility walking!).

Now to finish our update on a more positive note.  During our weekend break in Arundel early in 2006 we noticed it reporting a higher accuracy - to within 4 meters sometimes.  So maybe the promised GPS correction system satellites in Europe (EGNOS) are now coming online?

Our main use for the Sat Nav is to assist with finding a different way back to where we started a walk and using the GoTo function to navigate to a pre-determined (projected) waypoint, giving us the miles countdown and destination ETA.  For these uses the Sat Nav unit is fine, if a bit limited by the number of routes and tracks it can store and subject to it receiving a solid satellite signal.

Update Aug 07 - two years on - and a spooky sat nav story!
Well, after two years we've used our Garmin etrex Legend GPS Sat Nav receiver a fair bit and become familiar with all its little quirks and annoyances.  Following on from last year's update, we had another crazy reading instance on a walk - some 300 miles at 100 mph in an afternoon!  But even with a turbo powered vindaloo curry Mike can't walk that fast, or far!!

The problem with the Sat Nav receiver being unable to get a GPS satellite signal under heavy cloud, tree or city buildings remain, frustratingly this is the time you probably need it the most!  We're sick of seeing the message 'poor signal, need clear view of the sky' - godammit, it's got a clear view of the sky!  Another thing to report is that the left top most button - used to zoom out on the map - seems to require a firmer pressing than the others and we think it's become more recessed too.  This is worrying as it doesn't get excessive use.  If this indicates a looming mechanical failure with our Sat Nav unit, that would certainly be unacceptable in such a short time.

We discovered an issue with the navigate a route feature.  One day we attempted to use the GoTo to navigate to a projected waypoint we'd set, but appeared to have no GPS satellite signal for the whole journey (horror, we had to use... a map!...).  We thought the Sat Nav receiver had failed, but later realised it was still set to navigate a previous route.  So the unit just refused to acknowledge a signal when confronted with this conflict.  No error message, it just gave up.  A software upgrade would probably fix this, but still none have been forthcoming for the etrex Legend from Garmin.

The Sat Nav receiver is said to withstand immersion in water.  We've never tested this, but we did have a problem with the display misting up when using the unit in warm sunshine a week after previously using it in drizzle.  So it had clearly gotten damp inside.  Although this quickly cleared up of its own accord, nevertheless we wouldn't want to test the water immersion capability!

Now, the spooky sat nav story...
One day we discovered a mystery waypoint we hadn't set.  It was numbered 13 too, ooh er!  So we decided to navigate to it, somewhere in Brighton.  We trotted off towards the Hove border and found it located in a side street off a main road, although we could only get to within 10 meters as the waypoint was pointing into someone's property.  So we retired to the nearby cafe to ponder on this.  Now we've used this cafe before, and the obvious explanation is that we inadvertently marked the waypoint on the Sat Nav then.  But we've never been down the street nearest the point, and in any case the cafe is a good 150 meters away.  Now a GPS coordinate is rather fixed in position and cannot move, if we did set a waypoint in error previously then either the GPS satellites are way inaccurate or our Sat Nav receiver is.  We tested this theory by navigating to the waypoint we set outside our home over two years ago when we first bought the unit, and this was still spot-on.  We tried it with another early waypoint, also exactly right.  So that's a relief, but it still doesn't explain our mystery waypoint...

The GPS Sat Nav locations may be accurate, but we're still plagued by the inaccurate Basemap.  The photos (or rather video stills) below illustrate just how hopeless this is, from a walk we did along The Shropshire Way on holiday in 2007.  Notice the road and railway line seem to be the wrong way round too, were going to hit the road first.

One final point on waypoint accuracy.  We often enter into the Sat Nav a GPS coordinate obtained from a postcode (eg using Multimap), and did so to locate our 2007 Shropshire holiday cottage.  Usually this pinpoints a location fairly accurately.  However, on this occasion the GPS position was some 200 meters to the South West of the actual cottage.  It's probably an issue with the postcode system rather than GPS, but something to be aware of.

Update Sept 08 - three years on - and our GPS unit is still going strong!
Never worry about something that hasn't yet happened!  Remember our concern with the Sat Nav's recessed zoom button?  Well, this has came to nought and nothing's failed.  It's still recessed, but hasn't got any worse and continues to function just fine.  Not such a good outcome with our previously highlighted issue with the lanyard attachment to the battery cover rather than the GPS receiver itself which causes the cover to detach and sends the unit to the ground.  Despite being well aware of this problem, it's happened again a number of times and on one occasion the receiver landed onto the gravel driveway of our New Forest short break cottage on its face causing abrasions to the screen.  This really is poor design.  However, despite the numerous drops the hand-held GPS Sat Nav has proved a little toughie and continues to work just fine - too well sometimes as we've had another crazy reading!

Right. Although we've only maxed 4.9 MPH we've covered 343 miles in 2hr 42mins at an average 127 MPH!  Mike's been wearing his superhero underpants on the outside of his jeans again!

There's only been one new issue that's manifested itself with our Sat Nav unit since last year's update.  This is the Sat Nav receiver's rubberised surround oozing glue when it gets hot, eg on the car dash or left too long in the sun on a walk.  (Err, what sun?  The last two summers have been washouts!).

Still the Basemap doesn't tally with our location and still no software update from Garmin.  When the time comes to replace our GPS receiver, this situation will undoubtedly cause us to look at other brands.  We'll also go for a colour screen next time as we find the display difficult to follow.  In fact, we've been considering what to replace our Garmin GPS Sat Nav receiver with and decided a PDA or Palmtop type unit would be more suited to our needs, especially as we're into Geocaching now and web access, a photo store and making notes electronically while on the move would be really useful features.

Update Sept 09 - three years on - a software update at last!  And increased accuracy!
Yes, it's true, since our last update we've updated the GPS receiver's software (or rather firmware).  To be fair, we only did so while investigating the ability to download Geocache coordinates directly to the receiver from the Geocache website and suspect Garmin had the upgrade available for some time - we just hadn't checked for a while.  Anyway, a simple download and install later and we're up-to-date.  The GPS unit really does now receive the WAAS / EGNOS correction satellites and the best accuracy we've seen is to 1½ meters (6 feet) on a good day!  A bad day is when no EGNOS satellite is within range, usually when they're on the horizon in the sky which seems more often than not.

Another useful thing we've done is to integrate the unit with Google Earth and transfer our saved routes, tracks and waypoints - which then show up in 'Places' and added as a map layer.  This has confirmed our ongoing issue with the unit's Basemap, namely that it's very inaccurate, as our locations and tracks show up spot-on on Google Earth.

We've had a few problems since our last update.  Last time we mentioned the rubberised surround was oozing glue.  Well, this surround is now quite loose and unstuck.  Another problem was when the receiver locked up, displaying a pulsating, flashing display which we blamed on a low or iffy battery connection, but sorting this and even resetting (sw off/on) didn't fix it.  The next time we used it it was fine, so this remains a mystery.  And another problem is the display sometimes blanks out when the backlight is activated which isn't very helpful.

On our previous update we hinted at a replacement.  In fact, in the summer we did look at Pocket PCs and mobile devices and did a fair bit of research but couldn't come up with a unit that met all our desired requirements.  Then our fridge/freezer packed up (while away on our Cotswold holiday) so we had to re-allocate our earmarked funds.  Maybe next year...

See the main GPS receiver review.   

You can find the Garmin International website at: www.garmin.com

© micbinks 2005-2009.  Please ask permission if you wish to reproduce any of this content in full or in part.

View our Dorset holiday pages where we first used this product.